Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

COM vs FTGC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+12.0 pts
1 year to Nov 12, 2026: FTGC ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.26 pts
A year: COM 0.72%, FTGC 0.98%, per filings dated Mar 3, 2026 and Apr 30, 2026
Overlap
0%
Share of the two books held in common, holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 11, 2026
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

COM costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.0 points; FTGC is 17.1 times larger.

COM vs FTGC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOMFTGC
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.8%+27.8%
Drawdown
Below its high6.1%, high on Sep 10, 20267.7%, high on Sep 10, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksAuspice Broad Commodity IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.72%0.98%
Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026$193m$3.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

Key numbers
+15.8%
COM total return, 1 year
+27.8%
FTGC total return, 1 year
0.72%
COM expense ratio
0.98%
FTGC expense ratio

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, COM and FTGC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 11, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COM FTGC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in COM
N/A 14.27%
N/A 10.23%
N/A 8.20%
N/A 6.42%
N/A 3.09%
N/A 2.09%
N/A 1.83%
Only in FTGC
BRENT CRUDE FUTR Apr27 6.50%
GASOLINE RBOB FUT Mar27 6.46%
NATURAL GAS FUTR Jan27 6.12%
SOYBEAN MEAL FUTR Jan27 5.97%
SUGAR #11 (WORLD) Mar27 5.46%
LME ZINC FUTURE Dec26 5.34%
GOLD 100 OZ FUTR Dec26 5.21%
SILVER FUTURE Dec26 5.03%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +15.8% +27.8%
Expense ratio 0.72% 0.98%
Holdings 7 31
Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026 $193m $3.3bn

COM and FTGC on the fields both publish, as of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COM and FTGC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
COM

COM tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 12, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. It sat 6.1% below its high of Sep 10, 2026 on Nov 12, 2026.

FTGC

FTGC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Nov 12, 2026 it returned +27.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.98% a year. It sat 7.7% below its high of Sep 10, 2026 on Nov 12, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COM or FTGC?
In the year to Nov 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COM returned +15.8% and FTGC +27.8%.
Which is cheaper, COM or FTGC?
COM is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COM against FTGC, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/com-vs-ftgc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

Net assets on Nov 11, 2026: $193m for Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF and $3.3bn for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund.

Growth of 100

COM and FTGC

Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 year.

COM +15.8%FTGC +27.8%
Nov 12, 2025Nov 12, 2026

COM +15.8%, FTGC +27.8%: FTGC +12.0 pts ahead, 1 year, Nov 12, 2025 to Nov 12, 2026.