FTGC vs PIT: how they differ

FTGC and PIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PIT returned +64.3% over the year. First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF.

PIT costs 0.43 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 22.2 points; FTGC is 13.0 times larger.

FTGCPIT
Expense ratio0.98%0.55%
Net assets, FTGC as of Oct 8, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026$3.4bn$260m
Total return, 1 year+42.1%+64.3%
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+42.1%
FTGC total return, 1 year
+64.3%
PIT total return, 1 year
0.98%
FTGC expense ratio
0.55%
PIT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FTGC and PIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FTGC PIT
CATTLE FEEDER FUT Nov26 0.80% 0.00%
COCOA FUTURE Dec26 1.55% 0.00%
COFFEE 'C' FUTURE Dec26 4.66% 0.00%
COPPER FUTURE Dec26 5.05% 0.00%
CORN FUTURE Dec26 2.02% 0.00%
GASOLINE RBOB FUT Dec26 7.38% 0.00%
GASOLINE RBOB FUT Nov26 1.18% 0.00%
GOLD 100 OZ FUTR Dec26 6.28% 0.00%
LEAN HOGS FUTURE Dec26 1.21% 0.00%
LIVE CATTLE FUTR Dec26 1.68% 0.00%
Low Su Gasoil G Nov26 5.10% 0.00%
NY Harb ULSD Fut Dec26 4.74% 0.00%
Only in FTGC
BRENT CRUDE FUTR Jan27 6.53%
LME ZINC FUTURE Dec26 5.47%
NATURAL GAS FUTR Dec26 5.13%
LME PRI ALUM FUTR Dec26 4.00%
SUGAR #11 (WORLD) Mar27 3.82%
WHEAT FUTURE(CBT) Dec26 2.95%
NATURAL GAS FUTR Feb27 2.55%
SOYBEAN MEAL FUTR Dec26 2.24%
Only in PIT
Other 4.43%
Other 2.96%
Other 2.83%
Brent Crude Futr Dec26 0.00%
Brent Crude Futr Feb27 0.00%
Fcoj-A Future Nov26 0.00%
Lme Copper Future Nov26 0.00%
Lme Pri Alum Futr Nov26 0.00%

On the same fields

FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +42.1% +64.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +24.9 pts +47.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.98% 0.55%
Holdings 30 32
Net assets, FTGC as of Oct 8, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026 $3.4bn $260m

FTGC and PIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

FTGC in plain words

FTGC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +42.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.98% a year.

PIT in plain words

PIT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +64.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTGC or PIT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTGC returned +42.1% and PIT +64.3%.
Which is cheaper, FTGC or PIT?
PIT is cheaper, by 0.43 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $43. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, FTGC against PIT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftgc-vs-pit

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.