FTGC vs SDCI: how they differ

FTGC and SDCI hold 0% of their weight in the same names. First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund.

SDCI costs 0.38 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; FTGC is 4.2 times larger.

FTGCSDCI
Expense ratio0.98%0.60%
Net assets, FTGC as of Oct 8, 2026 and SDCI as of Oct 9, 2026$3.4bn$814m
Total return, 1 year+42.1%+42.0%
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+42.1%
FTGC total return, 1 year
+42.0%
SDCI total return, 1 year
0.98%
FTGC expense ratio
0.60%
SDCI expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FTGC and SDCI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FTGC SDCI
Only in FTGC
GASOLINE RBOB FUT Dec26 7.38%
BRENT CRUDE FUTR Jan27 6.53%
GOLD 100 OZ FUTR Dec26 6.28%
WTI CRUDE FUTURE Dec26 5.63%
LME ZINC FUTURE Dec26 5.47%
NATURAL GAS FUTR Dec26 5.13%
Low Su Gasoil G Nov26 5.10%
COPPER FUTURE Dec26 5.05%
Only in SDCI
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 7.99%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 6.99%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 5.69%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.80%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.79%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.77%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.83%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.28%

On the same fields

FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +42.1% +42.0%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +24.9 pts +24.7 pts
Expense ratio 0.98% 0.60%
Holdings 30 19
Net assets, FTGC as of Oct 8, 2026 and SDCI as of Oct 9, 2026 $3.4bn $814m

FTGC and SDCI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

FTGC in plain words

FTGC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +42.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.98% a year.

SDCI in plain words

SDCI is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +42.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTGC or SDCI?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTGC returned +42.1% and SDCI +42.0%.
Which is cheaper, FTGC or SDCI?
SDCI is cheaper, by 0.38 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $38. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, FTGC against SDCI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftgc-vs-sdci

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.