FTGC vs GSG: how they differ
FTGC is an actively managed commodity fund and GSG a commodity futures fund, and over the year GSG returned +57.4% against +42.1%. First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund and iShares GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust Fund.
GSG costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.3 points; FTGC is 3.3 times larger.
| FTGC | GSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 0.81% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $3.4bn | $1.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +42.1% | +57.4% |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Below its high | 52.8%, high on Jul 2, 2008 | |
On the same fields
FTGC and GSG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FTGC in plain words
FTGC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +42.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.98% a year.
GSG in plain words
GSG holds commodity futures. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +57.4% with distributions reinvested. It sat 52.8% below its high of Jul 2, 2008 on Oct 9, 2026.
Its expense ratio is 0.81% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTGC or GSG?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTGC returned +42.1% and GSG +57.4%.
- Which is cheaper, FTGC or GSG?
- GSG is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $17. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, FTGC against GSG, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftgc-vs-gsg
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FTGC against GSG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftgc-vs-gsg
[FTGC against GSG (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftgc-vs-gsg)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.