DBC vs GSG: how they differ
DBC and GSG are both commodity futures funds, and over the year GSG returned +57.4% against +51.0%. Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund and iShares GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust Fund.
GSG costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.4 points; DBC is 1.9 times larger.
| DBC | GSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.81% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $2.0bn | $1.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +51.0% | +57.4% |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Below its high | 14.8%, high on Jul 2, 2008 | 52.8%, high on Jul 2, 2008 |
On the same fields
DBC and GSG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DBC in plain words
DBC holds commodity futures. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +51.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year. It sat 14.8% below its high of Jul 2, 2008 on Oct 9, 2026.
GSG in plain words
GSG holds commodity futures. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +57.4% with distributions reinvested. It sat 52.8% below its high of Jul 2, 2008 on Oct 9, 2026.
Its expense ratio is 0.81% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DBC or GSG?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DBC returned +51.0% and GSG +57.4%.
- Which is cheaper, DBC or GSG?
- GSG is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $4. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, DBC against GSG, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dbc-vs-gsg
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). DBC against GSG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dbc-vs-gsg
[DBC against GSG (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dbc-vs-gsg)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.