ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

CERY vs PIT: how they differ

CERY and PIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PIT returned +64.3% over the year. State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF.

CERY costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.9 points; CERY is 4.3 times larger.

CERYPIT
Expense ratio0.28%0.55%
Net assets, CERY as of Oct 8, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026$1.1bn$260m
Total return, 1 year+45.4%+64.3%
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+45.4%
CERY total return, 1 year
+64.3%
PIT total return, 1 year
0.28%
CERY expense ratio
0.55%
PIT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CERY and PIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CERY PIT
Only in CERY
TRS USD BERYTR 5.91%
Only in PIT
Other 4.43%
Other 2.96%
Other 2.83%
Brent Crude Futr Dec26 0.00%
Brent Crude Futr Feb27 0.00%
Cattle Feeder Fut Nov26 0.00%
Cocoa Future Dec26 0.00%
Coffee 'C' Future Dec26 0.00%

On the same fields

CERY
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer State Street VanEck
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +45.4% +64.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +28.2 pts +47.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.28% 0.55%
Holdings 1 32
Net assets, CERY as of Oct 8, 2026 and PIT as of Jun 30, 2026 $1.1bn $260m

CERY and PIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CERY in plain words

CERY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +45.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year.

PIT in plain words

PIT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +64.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CERY or PIT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CERY returned +45.4% and PIT +64.3%.
Which is cheaper, CERY or PIT?
CERY is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $27. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
CERY vs FAARCERY vs COMBCERY vs NBCMBCD vs CERYCOMT vs PITPIT vs SDCIFAAR vs PITCOMB vs PIT
CERY on its own →PIT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
CERY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CERY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗State Street website ↗PIT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗PIT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VanEck website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CERY against PIT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cery-vs-pit

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.