Which returned more over the last year, BCD or CERY?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCD returned +31.8% and CERY +45.4%.

Which is cheaper, BCD or CERY?

CERY is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $2. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

BCD vs CERY: how they differ

BCD and CERY hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CERY returned +45.4% over the year. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF and State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

CERY costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.6 points; CERY is 2.5 times larger.

	BCD	CERY
Expense ratio	0.30%	0.28%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026	$445m	$1.1bn
Total return, 1 year	+31.8%	+45.4%
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+31.8%

BCD total return, 1 year

+45.4%

CERY total return, 1 year

0.30%

BCD expense ratio

0.28%

CERY expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCD and CERY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BCD CERY

Only in BCD

United States Treasury 5.20%

United States Treasury 5.19%

United States Treasury 5.18%

United States Treasury 4.95%

United States Treasury 4.94%

United States Treasury 4.93%

Only in CERY

TRS USD BERYTR 5.91%

On the same fields

BCD

abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF

CERY

State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer abrdn State Street

What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year +31.8% +45.4%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +14.6 pts +28.2 pts

Expense ratio 0.30% 0.28%

Holdings 17 1

Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $445m $1.1bn

BCD and CERY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BCD in plain words

BCD tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +31.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year.

CERY in plain words

CERY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +45.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BCD or CERY?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCD returned +31.8% and CERY +45.4%.
Which is cheaper, BCD or CERY?: CERY is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $2. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BCD vs GSG BCD vs COMT BCD vs SDCI BCD vs CMDT CERY vs NBCM CERY vs CMDY CERY vs CMDT CERY vs PIT

BCD on its own →CERY on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BCD filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BCD prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗abrdn website ↗CERY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CERY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗State Street website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BCD against CERY, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bcd-vs-cery

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.