ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

BCD vs CMDT: how they differ

BCD and CMDT hold 0% of their weight in the same names. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund.

BCD costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; CMDT is 1.7 times larger.

BCDCMDT
Expense ratio0.30%0.65%
Net assets, BCD as of Oct 8, 2026 and CMDT as of Jun 30, 2026$445m$751m
Total return, 1 year+31.8%+31.6%
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

+31.8%
BCD total return, 1 year
+31.6%
CMDT total return, 1 year
0.30%
BCD expense ratio
0.65%
CMDT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCD and CMDT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BCD CMDT
Only in BCD
United States Treasury 5.20%
United States Treasury 5.20%
United States Treasury 5.19%
United States Treasury 5.18%
United States Treasury 4.95%
United States Treasury 4.94%
United States Treasury 4.93%
United States Treasury 4.93%
Only in CMDT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund 5.91%
ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS IN 1.45%
LETRA TESOURO NACIONAL 1.43%
BANK OF MONTREAL 1.37%
TRANSCANADA PIPELINES 1.15%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 1.03%
Fannie Mae 0.94%
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY 0.94%

On the same fields

BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
CMDT
PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer abrdn PIMCO
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +31.8% +31.6%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +14.6 pts +14.4 pts
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.65%
Holdings 17 259
Net assets, BCD as of Oct 8, 2026 and CMDT as of Jun 30, 2026 $445m $751m

BCD and CMDT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BCD in plain words

BCD tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +31.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year.

CMDT in plain words

CMDT is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +31.6% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BCD or CMDT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCD returned +31.8% and CMDT +31.6%.
Which is cheaper, BCD or CMDT?
BCD is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $35. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
BCD vs CMDYBCD vs CERYBCD vs NBCMBCD vs PITCMDT vs NBCMCMDT vs CMDYCMDT vs PITCMDT vs SDCI
BCD on its own →CMDT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
BCD filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BCD prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗abrdn website ↗CMDT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CMDT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗PIMCO website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BCD against CMDT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bcd-vs-cmdt

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.