ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

CMDT vs CMDY: how they differ

CMDT and CMDY hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CMDY returned +36.5% over the year. PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF.

CMDY costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.9 points.

CMDTCMDY
Expense ratio0.65%0.28%
Net assets, CMDT as of Jun 30, 2026 and CMDY as of Oct 8, 2026$751m$738m
Total return, 1 year+31.6%+36.5%
Holdings in common0%
Below its high3.0%, high on Sep 10, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+31.6%
CMDT total return, 1 year
+36.5%
CMDY total return, 1 year
0.65%
CMDT expense ratio
0.28%
CMDY expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CMDT and CMDY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CMDT CMDY
Only in CMDT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund 5.91%
ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS IN 1.45%
LETRA TESOURO NACIONAL 1.43%
BANK OF MONTREAL 1.37%
TRANSCANADA PIPELINES 1.15%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 1.03%
Fannie Mae 0.94%
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY 0.94%
Only in CMDY
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CO 2.02%
CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.62%
SHEFFIELD RECEIVABLES CORP 144A 1.36%
DTE ELECTRIC CO 1.35%
SUMITOMO CORP OF AMERICA 1.35%
CONCORD MINUTEMEN CAPITAL CO 144A 1.34%
DUKE ENERGY CORP 144A 1.22%
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND 144A 1.19%

On the same fields

CMDT
PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer PIMCO iShares
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +31.6% +36.5%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +14.4 pts +19.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.28%
Holdings 259 86
Net assets, CMDT as of Jun 30, 2026 and CMDY as of Oct 8, 2026 $751m $738m

CMDT and CMDY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CMDT in plain words

CMDT is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +31.6% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return.

CMDY in plain words

CMDY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +36.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. It sat 3.0% below its high of Sep 10, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CMDT or CMDY?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CMDT returned +31.6% and CMDY +36.5%.
Which is cheaper, CMDT or CMDY?
CMDY is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $37. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
CMDT vs COMBCMDT vs GSGCMDT vs NBCMCMDT vs COMTCMDY vs COMBCMDY vs GSGCMDY vs NBCMCMDY vs COMT
CMDT on its own →CMDY on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
CMDT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CMDT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗PIMCO website ↗CMDY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CMDY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for CMDY ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CMDT against CMDY, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cmdt-vs-cmdy

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.