Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

CMDT vs COM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+6.1 pts
1 year to Nov 12, 2026: CMDT ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.07 pts
A year: CMDT 0.65%, COM 0.72%, per filings dated Mar 3, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026
Overlap
0%
Share of the two books held in common, holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

CMDT costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.1 points.

CMDT vs COM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCMDTCOM
Return
Total return, 1 year+21.9%+15.8%
Drawdown
Below its high6.8%, high on Oct 13, 20266.1%, high on Sep 10, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedAuspice Broad Commodity Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.65%0.72%
Net assets, CMDT as of Jun 30, 2026 and COM as of Nov 11, 2026$751m$193m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

Key numbers
+21.9%
CMDT total return, 1 year
+15.8%
COM total return, 1 year
0.65%
CMDT expense ratio
0.72%
COM expense ratio

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, CMDT and COM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CMDT COM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CMDT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund 5.91%
ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS IN 1.45%
LETRA TESOURO NACIONAL 1.43%
BANK OF MONTREAL 1.37%
TRANSCANADA PIPELINES 1.15%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 1.03%
Fannie Mae 0.94%
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY 0.94%
Only in COM
N/A 14.27%
N/A 10.23%
N/A 8.20%
N/A 6.42%
N/A 3.09%
N/A 2.09%
N/A 1.83%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +21.9% +15.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +25.9% (BCI) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −4.0 pts vs BCI not measured
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.72%
Holdings 259 7
Net assets, CMDT as of Jun 30, 2026 and COM as of Nov 11, 2026 $751m $193m

CMDT and COM on the fields both publish, as of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CMDT

CMDT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Nov 12, 2026 it returned +21.9% with distributions reinvested, against +25.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year. It sat 6.8% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Nov 12, 2026.

COM

COM tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 12, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. It sat 6.1% below its high of Sep 10, 2026 on Nov 12, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CMDT or COM?
In the year to Nov 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CMDT returned +21.9% and COM +15.8%.
Which is cheaper, CMDT or COM?
CMDT is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CMDT against COM, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cmdt-vs-com

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

Net assets: $751m on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $193m on Nov 11, 2026 for Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF.

Growth of 100

CMDT and COM

Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 year.

CMDT +21.9%COM +15.8%
Nov 12, 2025Nov 12, 2026

CMDT +21.9%, COM +15.8%: CMDT +6.1 pts ahead, 1 year, Nov 12, 2025 to Nov 12, 2026.