Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

COM vs COMB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+10.0 pts
1 year to Nov 12, 2026: COMB ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.47 pts
A year: COM 0.72%, COMB 0.25%, per filings dated Mar 3, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026
Overlap
0%
Share of the two books held in common, holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

COMB costs 0.47 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.0 points; COM is 1.3 times larger.

COM vs COMB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOMCOMB
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.8%+25.8%
Drawdown
Below its high6.1%, high on Sep 10, 20268.4%, high on Sep 10, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksAuspice Broad Commodity IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.72%0.25%
Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026$193m$151m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

Key numbers
+15.8%
COM total return, 1 year
+25.8%
COMB total return, 1 year
0.72%
COM expense ratio
0.25%
COMB expense ratio

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, COM and COMB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COM COMB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in COM
N/A 14.27%
N/A 10.23%
N/A 8.20%
N/A 6.42%
N/A 3.09%
N/A 2.09%
N/A 1.83%
Only in COMB
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +15.8% +25.8%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +25.9% (BCI)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.1 pts vs BCI
Expense ratio 0.72% 0.25%
Holdings 7 0
Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026 $193m $151m

COM and COMB on the fields both publish, as of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
COM

COM tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 12, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. It sat 6.1% below its high of Sep 10, 2026 on Nov 12, 2026.

COMB

COMB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Nov 12, 2026 it returned +25.8% with distributions reinvested, against +25.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 8.4% below its high of Sep 10, 2026 on Nov 12, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COM or COMB?
In the year to Nov 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COM returned +15.8% and COMB +25.8%.
Which is cheaper, COM or COMB?
COMB is cheaper, by 0.47 percentage points a year. That is about $47 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COM against COMB, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/com-vs-comb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

Net assets on Nov 11, 2026: $193m for Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF and $151m for GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF.

Growth of 100

COM and COMB

Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 year.

COM +15.8%COMB +25.8%
Nov 12, 2025Nov 12, 2026

COM +15.8%, COMB +25.8%: COMB +10.0 pts ahead, 1 year, Nov 12, 2025 to Nov 12, 2026.