Which returned more over the last year, COMB or PDBC?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COMB returned +40.1% and PDBC +51.9%.

Which is cheaper, COMB or PDBC?

COMB is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $34. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

COMB vs PDBC: how they differ

COMB and PDBC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PDBC returned +51.9% over the year. GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

COMB costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.8 points; PDBC is far larger, $7.9bn against $161m.

	COMB	PDBC
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026	$161m	$7.9bn
Total return, 1 year	+40.1%	+51.9%
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+40.1%

COMB total return, 1 year

+51.9%

PDBC total return, 1 year

0.25%

COMB expense ratio

0.59%

PDBC expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COMB and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding COMB PDBC

Only in COMB

Only in PDBC

POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 18.02%

On the same fields

COMB

GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF

PDBC

Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer GraniteShares Invesco

What it is Actively managed Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +40.1% +51.9%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +22.9 pts +34.6 pts

Expense ratio 0.25% 0.59%

Holdings 0 1

Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $161m $7.9bn

COMB and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

COMB in plain words

COMB is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +40.1% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index.

PDBC in plain words

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +51.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COMB or PDBC?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COMB returned +40.1% and PDBC +51.9%.
Which is cheaper, COMB or PDBC?: COMB is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $34. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

COMB vs HGER COMB vs DBC COMB vs COMT CERY vs COMB PDBC vs PIT COMT vs PDBC FTGC vs PDBC FAAR vs PDBC

COMB on its own →PDBC on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

COMB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗COMB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗GraniteShares page for COMB ↗PDBC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗PDBC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for PDBC ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, COMB against PDBC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/comb-vs-pdbc

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.