CMDT vs FAAR: how they differ
CMDT and FAAR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CMDT returned +31.6% over the year. PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF.
CMDT costs 0.33 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.9 points; CMDT is 3.1 times larger.
| CMDT | FAAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.98% |
| Net assets, CMDT as of Jun 30, 2026 and FAAR as of Oct 8, 2026 | $751m | $241m |
| Total return, 1 year | +31.6% | +19.7% |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Below its high | 3.9%, high on May 18, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CMDT and FAAR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
CMDT and FAAR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CMDT in plain words
CMDT is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +31.6% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return.
FAAR in plain words
FAAR is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.98% a year. It sat 3.9% below its high of May 18, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.7% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CMDT or FAAR?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CMDT returned +31.6% and FAAR +19.7%.
- Which is cheaper, CMDT or FAAR?
- CMDT is cheaper, by 0.33 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $33. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, CMDT against FAAR, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cmdt-vs-faar
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CMDT against FAAR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cmdt-vs-faar
[CMDT against FAAR (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cmdt-vs-faar)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.