CMDY vs SDCI: how they differ

CMDY and SDCI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SDCI returned +42.0% over the year. iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund.

CMDY costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.5 points; SDCI is 1.1 times larger.

CMDYSDCI
Expense ratio0.28%0.60%
Net assets, CMDY as of Oct 8, 2026 and SDCI as of Oct 9, 2026$738m$814m
Total return, 1 year+36.5%+42.0%
Holdings in common0%
Below its high3.0%, high on Sep 10, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+36.5%
CMDY total return, 1 year
+42.0%
SDCI total return, 1 year
0.28%
CMDY expense ratio
0.60%
SDCI expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CMDY and SDCI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CMDY SDCI
Only in CMDY
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CO 2.02%
CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.62%
SHEFFIELD RECEIVABLES CORP 144A 1.36%
DTE ELECTRIC CO 1.35%
SUMITOMO CORP OF AMERICA 1.35%
CONCORD MINUTEMEN CAPITAL CO 144A 1.34%
DUKE ENERGY CORP 144A 1.22%
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND 144A 1.19%
Only in SDCI
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 7.99%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 6.99%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 5.69%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.80%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.79%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.77%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.83%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.28%

On the same fields

CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer iShares USCF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +36.5% +42.0%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +19.2 pts +24.7 pts
Expense ratio 0.28% 0.60%
Holdings 86 19
Net assets, CMDY as of Oct 8, 2026 and SDCI as of Oct 9, 2026 $738m $814m

CMDY and SDCI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CMDY in plain words

CMDY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +36.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. It sat 3.0% below its high of Sep 10, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

SDCI in plain words

SDCI is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +42.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CMDY or SDCI?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CMDY returned +36.5% and SDCI +42.0%.
Which is cheaper, CMDY or SDCI?
CMDY is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $32. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CMDY against SDCI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cmdy-vs-sdci

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.