ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

PIT vs SDCI: how they differ

PIT and SDCI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PIT returned +64.3% over the year. VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund.

PIT costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 22.3 points; SDCI is 3.1 times larger.

PITSDCI
Expense ratio0.55%0.60%
Net assets, PIT as of Jun 30, 2026 and SDCI as of Oct 9, 2026$260m$814m
Total return, 1 year+64.3%+42.0%
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+64.3%
PIT total return, 1 year
+42.0%
SDCI total return, 1 year
0.55%
PIT expense ratio
0.60%
SDCI expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, PIT and SDCI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding PIT SDCI
Only in PIT
Other 4.43%
Other 2.96%
Other 2.83%
Brent Crude Futr Dec26 0.00%
Brent Crude Futr Feb27 0.00%
Cattle Feeder Fut Nov26 0.00%
Cocoa Future Dec26 0.00%
Coffee 'C' Future Dec26 0.00%
Only in SDCI
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 7.99%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 6.99%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 5.69%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.80%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.79%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 3.77%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.83%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE PUBLIC DEBT 2.28%

On the same fields

PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer VanEck USCF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +64.3% +42.0%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +47.1 pts +24.7 pts
Expense ratio 0.55% 0.60%
Holdings 32 19
Net assets, PIT as of Jun 30, 2026 and SDCI as of Oct 9, 2026 $260m $814m

PIT and SDCI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

PIT in plain words

PIT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +64.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year.

SDCI in plain words

SDCI is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +42.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PIT or SDCI?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PIT returned +64.3% and SDCI +42.0%.
Which is cheaper, PIT or SDCI?
PIT is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $5. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
CMDT vs PITCMDY vs PITGSG vs PITCERY vs PITFAAR vs SDCICOMB vs SDCINBCM vs SDCIBCD vs SDCI
PIT on its own →SDCI on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
PIT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗PIT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VanEck website ↗SDCI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗SDCI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗USCF website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, PIT against SDCI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pit-vs-sdci

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.