Which returned more over the last year, CERY or PDBC?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CERY returned +45.4% and PDBC +51.9%.

Which is cheaper, CERY or PDBC?

CERY is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $31. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

CERY vs PDBC: how they differ

CERY and PDBC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PDBC returned +51.9% over the year. State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

CERY costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.5 points; PDBC is 7.0 times larger.

	CERY	PDBC
Expense ratio	0.28%	0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026	$1.1bn	$7.9bn
Total return, 1 year	+45.4%	+51.9%
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+45.4%

CERY total return, 1 year

+51.9%

PDBC total return, 1 year

0.28%

CERY expense ratio

0.59%

PDBC expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CERY and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding CERY PDBC

Only in CERY

TRS USD BERYTR 5.91%

Only in PDBC

POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 18.02%

On the same fields

CERY

State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

PDBC

Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer State Street Invesco

What it is Tracks an index Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +45.4% +51.9%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +28.2 pts +34.6 pts

Expense ratio 0.28% 0.59%

Holdings 1 1

Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $1.1bn $7.9bn

CERY and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CERY in plain words

CERY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +45.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year.

PDBC in plain words

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +51.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CERY or PDBC?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CERY returned +45.4% and PDBC +51.9%.
Which is cheaper, CERY or PDBC?: CERY is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $31. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CERY vs HGER CERY vs NBCM CERY vs FTGC CERY vs DBC GSG vs PDBC FAAR vs PDBC COMB vs PDBC COMT vs PDBC

CERY on its own →PDBC on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

CERY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CERY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗State Street website ↗PDBC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗PDBC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for PDBC ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CERY against PDBC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cery-vs-pdbc

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.