Which returned more over the last year, BCI or CERY?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCI returned +40.2% and CERY +45.4%.

Which is cheaper, BCI or CERY?

BCI is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $2. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

BCI vs CERY: how they differ

BCI and CERY hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CERY returned +45.4% over the year. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF and State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

BCI costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.2 points; BCI is 3.1 times larger.

	BCI	CERY
Expense ratio	0.26%	0.28%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026	$3.5bn	$1.1bn
Total return, 1 year	+40.2%	+45.4%
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+40.2%

BCI total return, 1 year

+45.4%

CERY total return, 1 year

0.26%

BCI expense ratio

0.28%

CERY expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCI and CERY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BCI CERY

Only in BCI

United States Treasury 5.17%

United States Treasury 5.13%

United States Treasury 5.09%

United States Treasury 5.07%

United States Treasury 5.04%

United States Treasury 5.03%

United States Treasury 4.99%

Only in CERY

TRS USD BERYTR 5.91%

On the same fields

BCI

abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF

CERY

State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer abrdn State Street

What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year +40.2% +45.4%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +23.0 pts +28.2 pts

Expense ratio 0.26% 0.28%

Holdings 16 1

Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $3.5bn $1.1bn

BCI and CERY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BCI in plain words

BCI tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year.

CERY in plain words

CERY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +45.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BCI or CERY?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCI returned +40.2% and CERY +45.4%.
Which is cheaper, BCI or CERY?: BCI is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $2. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BCI vs GSG BCI vs COMT BCI vs SDCI BCI vs DBC CERY vs FTGC CERY vs HGER CERY vs DBC CERY vs PDBC

BCI on its own →CERY on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BCI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BCI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗abrdn website ↗CERY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CERY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗State Street website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BCI against CERY, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bci-vs-cery

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.