ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

BCI vs CMDT: how they differ

BCI and CMDT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and BCI returned +40.2% over the year. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund.

BCI costs 0.39 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.6 points; BCI is 4.7 times larger.

BCICMDT
Expense ratio0.26%0.65%
Net assets, BCI as of Oct 8, 2026 and CMDT as of Jun 30, 2026$3.5bn$751m
Total return, 1 year+40.2%+31.6%
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

+40.2%
BCI total return, 1 year
+31.6%
CMDT total return, 1 year
0.26%
BCI expense ratio
0.65%
CMDT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCI and CMDT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BCI CMDT
Only in BCI
United States Treasury 5.17%
United States Treasury 5.13%
United States Treasury 5.09%
United States Treasury 5.07%
United States Treasury 5.07%
United States Treasury 5.04%
United States Treasury 5.03%
United States Treasury 4.99%
Only in CMDT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund 5.91%
ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS IN 1.45%
LETRA TESOURO NACIONAL 1.43%
BANK OF MONTREAL 1.37%
TRANSCANADA PIPELINES 1.15%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 1.03%
Fannie Mae 0.94%
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY 0.94%

On the same fields

BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
CMDT
PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer abrdn PIMCO
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +40.2% +31.6%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +23.0 pts +14.4 pts
Expense ratio 0.26% 0.65%
Holdings 16 259
Net assets, BCI as of Oct 8, 2026 and CMDT as of Jun 30, 2026 $3.5bn $751m

BCI and CMDT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BCI in plain words

BCI tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year.

CMDT in plain words

CMDT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +31.6% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BCI or CMDT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCI returned +40.2% and CMDT +31.6%.
Which is cheaper, BCI or CMDT?
BCI is cheaper, by 0.39 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $39. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
BCI vs CERYBCI vs FAARBCI vs FTGCBCI vs COMBCMDT vs FTGCCMDT vs HGERCMDT vs DBCCMDT vs PDBC
BCI on its own →CMDT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
BCI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BCI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗abrdn website ↗CMDT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CMDT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗PIMCO website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BCI against CMDT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bci-vs-cmdt

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.