ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

BCI vs COMB: how they differ

BCI and COMB hold 0% of their weight in the same names. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF.

COMB costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; BCI is far larger, $3.5bn against $161m.

BCICOMB
Expense ratio0.26%0.25%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$3.5bn$161m
Total return, 1 year+40.2%+40.1%
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

+40.2%
BCI total return, 1 year
+40.1%
COMB total return, 1 year
0.26%
BCI expense ratio
0.25%
COMB expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCI and COMB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BCI COMB
Only in BCI
United States Treasury 5.17%
United States Treasury 5.13%
United States Treasury 5.09%
United States Treasury 5.07%
United States Treasury 5.07%
United States Treasury 5.04%
United States Treasury 5.03%
United States Treasury 4.99%
Only in COMB

On the same fields

BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
COMB
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer abrdn GraniteShares
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +40.2% +40.1%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +23.0 pts +22.9 pts
Expense ratio 0.26% 0.25%
Holdings 16 0
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $3.5bn $161m

BCI and COMB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BCI in plain words

BCI tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year.

COMB in plain words

COMB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +40.1% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BCI or COMB?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCI returned +40.2% and COMB +40.1%.
Which is cheaper, BCI or COMB?
COMB is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $1. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
BCI vs FAARBCI vs PITBCI vs NBCMBCI vs CMDYCOMB vs FTGCCOMB vs HGERCOMB vs DBCCOMB vs PDBC
BCI on its own →COMB on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
BCI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BCI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗abrdn website ↗COMB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗COMB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗GraniteShares page for COMB ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BCI against COMB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bci-vs-comb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.