ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

BCI vs CMDY: how they differ

BCI and CMDY hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and BCI returned +40.2% over the year. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF.

BCI costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.7 points; BCI is 4.7 times larger.

BCICMDY
Expense ratio0.26%0.28%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$3.5bn$738m
Total return, 1 year+40.2%+36.5%
Holdings in common0%
Below its high3.0%, high on Sep 10, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+40.2%
BCI total return, 1 year
+36.5%
CMDY total return, 1 year
0.26%
BCI expense ratio
0.28%
CMDY expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCI and CMDY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BCI CMDY
Only in BCI
United States Treasury 5.17%
United States Treasury 5.13%
United States Treasury 5.09%
United States Treasury 5.07%
United States Treasury 5.07%
United States Treasury 5.04%
United States Treasury 5.03%
United States Treasury 4.99%
Only in CMDY
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CO 2.02%
CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.62%
SHEFFIELD RECEIVABLES CORP 144A 1.36%
DTE ELECTRIC CO 1.35%
SUMITOMO CORP OF AMERICA 1.35%
CONCORD MINUTEMEN CAPITAL CO 144A 1.34%
DUKE ENERGY CORP 144A 1.22%
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND 144A 1.19%

On the same fields

BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer abrdn iShares
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +40.2% +36.5%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +23.0 pts +19.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.26% 0.28%
Holdings 16 86
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $3.5bn $738m

BCI and CMDY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BCI in plain words

BCI tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year.

CMDY in plain words

CMDY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +36.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. It sat 3.0% below its high of Sep 10, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BCI or CMDY?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCI returned +40.2% and CMDY +36.5%.
Which is cheaper, BCI or CMDY?
BCI is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $2. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
BCI vs HGERBCI vs PDBCBCI vs CMDTBCI vs SDCICMDY vs FTGCCMDY vs HGERCMDY vs DBCCMDY vs PDBC
BCI on its own →CMDY on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
BCI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BCI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗abrdn website ↗CMDY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CMDY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for CMDY ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BCI against CMDY, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bci-vs-cmdy

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.