Which returned more over the last year, BCI or PDBC?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCI returned +40.2% and PDBC +51.9%.

Which is cheaper, BCI or PDBC?

BCI is cheaper, by 0.33 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $33. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

BCI vs PDBC: how they differ

BCI and PDBC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PDBC returned +51.9% over the year. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

BCI costs 0.33 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.7 points; PDBC is 2.3 times larger.

	BCI	PDBC
Expense ratio	0.26%	0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026	$3.5bn	$7.9bn
Total return, 1 year	+40.2%	+51.9%
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+40.2%

BCI total return, 1 year

+51.9%

PDBC total return, 1 year

0.26%

BCI expense ratio

0.59%

PDBC expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCI and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BCI PDBC

Only in BCI

United States Treasury 5.17%

United States Treasury 5.13%

United States Treasury 5.09%

United States Treasury 5.07%

United States Treasury 5.04%

United States Treasury 5.03%

United States Treasury 4.99%

Only in PDBC

POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 18.02%

On the same fields

BCI

abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF

PDBC

Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer abrdn Invesco

What it is Tracks an index Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +40.2% +51.9%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +23.0 pts +34.6 pts

Expense ratio 0.26% 0.59%

Holdings 16 1

Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $3.5bn $7.9bn

BCI and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BCI in plain words

BCI tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year.

PDBC in plain words

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +51.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BCI or PDBC?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCI returned +40.2% and PDBC +51.9%.
Which is cheaper, BCI or PDBC?: BCI is cheaper, by 0.33 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $33. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BCI vs HGER BCI vs DBC BCI vs COMT BCI vs CERY FTGC vs PDBC HGER vs PDBC DBC vs PDBC COMT vs PDBC

BCI on its own →PDBC on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BCI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BCI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗abrdn website ↗PDBC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗PDBC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for PDBC ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BCI against PDBC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bci-vs-pdbc

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.