Which returned more over the last year, BCI or COMT?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCI returned +40.2% and COMT +50.7%.

Which is cheaper, BCI or COMT?

BCI is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $22. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

BCI vs COMT: how they differ

BCI and COMT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COMT returned +50.7% over the year. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF.

BCI costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.5 points; BCI is 2.5 times larger.

	BCI	COMT
Expense ratio	0.26%	0.48%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026	$3.5bn	$1.4bn
Total return, 1 year	+40.2%	+50.7%
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+40.2%

BCI total return, 1 year

+50.7%

COMT total return, 1 year

0.26%

BCI expense ratio

0.48%

COMT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCI and COMT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BCI COMT

Only in BCI

United States Treasury 5.17%

United States Treasury 5.13%

United States Treasury 5.09%

United States Treasury 5.07%

United States Treasury 5.04%

United States Treasury 5.03%

United States Treasury 4.99%

Only in COMT

FIDELITY NATL INFO SERV 144A 1.74%

CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.53%

EATON CAPITAL UNLIMITED 144A 1.06%

NTT FINANCE AMERICAS INC 144A 1.05%

HELVETICA FUNDING CO LLC 144A 0.98%

GLENCOVE FUNDING LLC 144A 0.97%

NEXTERA ENERGY CAPITAL HOLDINGS IN 144A 0.97%

ENBRIDGE INC 144A 0.94%

On the same fields

BCI

abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF

COMT

iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer abrdn iShares

What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year +40.2% +50.7%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +23.0 pts +33.5 pts

Expense ratio 0.26% 0.48%

Holdings 16 176

Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $3.5bn $1.4bn

BCI and COMT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BCI in plain words

BCI tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year.

COMT in plain words

COMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +50.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.48% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BCI or COMT?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCI returned +40.2% and COMT +50.7%.
Which is cheaper, BCI or COMT?: BCI is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $22. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BCI vs CERY BCI vs GSG BCI vs DBC BCI vs FTGC COMT vs FTGC COMT vs HGER COMT vs DBC COMT vs PDBC

BCI on its own →COMT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BCI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BCI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗abrdn website ↗COMT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗COMT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for COMT ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BCI against COMT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bci-vs-comt

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.