COMT vs DBC: how they differ
COMT is a commodity fund and DBC a commodity futures fund, and over the year they finished level, +50.7% against +51.0%. iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund.
COMT costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; DBC is 1.4 times larger.
| COMT | DBC | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.48% | 0.85% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $1.4bn | $2.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +50.7% | +51.0% |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Below its high | 14.8%, high on Jul 2, 2008 | |
On the same fields
COMT and DBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COMT in plain words
COMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +50.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.48% a year.
DBC in plain words
DBC holds commodity futures. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +51.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year. It sat 14.8% below its high of Jul 2, 2008 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COMT or DBC?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COMT returned +50.7% and DBC +51.0%.
- Which is cheaper, COMT or DBC?
- COMT is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $37. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, COMT against DBC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/comt-vs-dbc
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). COMT against DBC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/comt-vs-dbc
[COMT against DBC (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/comt-vs-dbc)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.