BCI vs HGER: how they differ

BCI and HGER hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and HGER returned +48.4% over the year. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF.

BCI costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.2 points; HGER is 1.4 times larger.

BCIHGER
Expense ratio0.26%0.68%
Net assets, BCI as of Oct 8, 2026 and HGER as of Oct 9, 2026$3.5bn$4.8bn
Total return, 1 year+40.2%+48.4%
Holdings in common13%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund87.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+40.2%
BCI total return, 1 year
+48.4%
HGER total return, 1 year
0.26%
BCI expense ratio
0.68%
HGER expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCI and HGER hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

half

13% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BCI HGER
United States Treasury 5.17% 17.27%
United States Treasury 5.07% 6.91%
United States Treasury 5.07% 2.72%
Only in BCI
United States Treasury 5.13%
United States Treasury 5.09%
United States Treasury 5.04%
United States Treasury 5.03%
United States Treasury 4.99%
United States Treasury 4.94%
United States Treasury 4.89%
United States Treasury 4.82%
Only in HGER
United States Treasury 16.31%
United States Treasury 15.49%
United States Treasury 15.40%
United States Treasury 13.41%

On the same fields

BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer abrdn Harbor
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy
Total return, 1 year +40.2% +48.4%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +23.0 pts +31.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.26% 0.68%
Holdings 16 7
Net assets, BCI as of Oct 8, 2026 and HGER as of Oct 9, 2026 $3.5bn $4.8bn

BCI and HGER on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BCI in plain words

BCI tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year.

HGER in plain words

HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +48.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 87.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BCI or HGER?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCI returned +40.2% and HGER +48.4%.
Which is cheaper, BCI or HGER?
BCI is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $42. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BCI against HGER, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bci-vs-hger

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.