FTGC vs HGER: how they differ

FTGC and HGER hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and HGER returned +48.4% over the year. First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF.

HGER costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.3 points; HGER is 1.4 times larger.

FTGCHGER
Expense ratio0.98%0.68%
Net assets, FTGC as of Oct 8, 2026 and HGER as of Oct 9, 2026$3.4bn$4.8bn
Total return, 1 year+42.1%+48.4%
Holdings in common0%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund87.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+42.1%
FTGC total return, 1 year
+48.4%
HGER total return, 1 year
0.98%
FTGC expense ratio
0.68%
HGER expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FTGC and HGER hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FTGC HGER
Only in FTGC
GASOLINE RBOB FUT Dec26 7.38%
BRENT CRUDE FUTR Jan27 6.53%
GOLD 100 OZ FUTR Dec26 6.28%
WTI CRUDE FUTURE Dec26 5.63%
LME ZINC FUTURE Dec26 5.47%
NATURAL GAS FUTR Dec26 5.13%
Low Su Gasoil G Nov26 5.10%
COPPER FUTURE Dec26 5.05%
Only in HGER
United States Treasury 17.27%
United States Treasury 16.31%
United States Treasury 15.49%
United States Treasury 15.40%
United States Treasury 13.41%
United States Treasury 6.91%
United States Treasury 2.72%

On the same fields

FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy
Total return, 1 year +42.1% +48.4%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +24.9 pts +31.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.98% 0.68%
Holdings 30 7
Net assets, FTGC as of Oct 8, 2026 and HGER as of Oct 9, 2026 $3.4bn $4.8bn

FTGC and HGER on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

FTGC in plain words

FTGC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +42.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.98% a year.

HGER in plain words

HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +48.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 87.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTGC or HGER?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTGC returned +42.1% and HGER +48.4%.
Which is cheaper, FTGC or HGER?
HGER is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $30. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, FTGC against HGER, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftgc-vs-hger

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.