ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

CERY vs COMT: how they differ

CERY and COMT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COMT returned +50.7% over the year. State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF.

CERY costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.3 points; COMT is 1.2 times larger.

CERYCOMT
Expense ratio0.28%0.48%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$1.1bn$1.4bn
Total return, 1 year+45.4%+50.7%
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+45.4%
CERY total return, 1 year
+50.7%
COMT total return, 1 year
0.28%
CERY expense ratio
0.48%
COMT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CERY and COMT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CERY COMT
Only in CERY
TRS USD BERYTR 5.91%
Only in COMT
FIDELITY NATL INFO SERV 144A 1.74%
CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.53%
EATON CAPITAL UNLIMITED 144A 1.06%
NTT FINANCE AMERICAS INC 144A 1.05%
HELVETICA FUNDING CO LLC 144A 0.98%
GLENCOVE FUNDING LLC 144A 0.97%
NEXTERA ENERGY CAPITAL HOLDINGS IN 144A 0.97%
ENBRIDGE INC 144A 0.94%

On the same fields

CERY
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
COMT
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer State Street iShares
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +45.4% +50.7%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +28.2 pts +33.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.28% 0.48%
Holdings 1 176
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $1.1bn $1.4bn

CERY and COMT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CERY in plain words

CERY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +45.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year.

COMT in plain words

COMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +50.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.48% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CERY or COMT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CERY returned +45.4% and COMT +50.7%.
Which is cheaper, CERY or COMT?
CERY is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $20. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
CERY vs FTGCCERY vs HGERCERY vs PDBCCERY vs COMBCOMT vs FAARCOMT vs GSGCOMT vs SDCICOMT vs DBC
CERY on its own →COMT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
CERY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CERY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗State Street website ↗COMT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗COMT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for COMT ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CERY against COMT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cery-vs-comt

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.