Which returned more over the last year, BCD or PDBC?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCD returned +31.8% and PDBC +51.9%.

Which is cheaper, BCD or PDBC?

BCD is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $29. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

BCD vs PDBC: how they differ

BCD and PDBC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PDBC returned +51.9% over the year. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

BCD costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 20.1 points; PDBC is 17.7 times larger.

	BCD	PDBC
Expense ratio	0.30%	0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026	$445m	$7.9bn
Total return, 1 year	+31.8%	+51.9%
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+31.8%

BCD total return, 1 year

+51.9%

PDBC total return, 1 year

0.30%

BCD expense ratio

0.59%

PDBC expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCD and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BCD PDBC

Only in BCD

United States Treasury 5.20%

United States Treasury 5.19%

United States Treasury 5.18%

United States Treasury 4.95%

United States Treasury 4.94%

United States Treasury 4.93%

Only in PDBC

POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 18.02%

On the same fields

BCD

abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF

PDBC

Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer abrdn Invesco

What it is Tracks an index Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +31.8% +51.9%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +14.6 pts +34.6 pts

Expense ratio 0.30% 0.59%

Holdings 17 1

Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $445m $7.9bn

BCD and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BCD in plain words

BCD tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +31.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year.

PDBC in plain words

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +51.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BCD or PDBC?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCD returned +31.8% and PDBC +51.9%.
Which is cheaper, BCD or PDBC?: BCD is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $29. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BCD vs HGER BCD vs BCI BCD vs FTGC BCD vs DBC CMDY vs PDBC CMDT vs PDBC PDBC vs PIT PDBC vs SDCI

BCD on its own →PDBC on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BCD filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BCD prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗abrdn website ↗PDBC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗PDBC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for PDBC ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BCD against PDBC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bcd-vs-pdbc

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.