ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

BCD vs BCI: how they differ

BCD and BCI hold 72% of their weight in the same names, and BCI returned +40.2% over the year. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF.

BCI costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.4 points; BCI is 7.8 times larger.

BCDBCI
Expense ratio0.30%0.26%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$445m$3.5bn
Total return, 1 year+31.8%+40.2%
Holdings in common72%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

+31.8%
BCD total return, 1 year
+40.2%
BCI total return, 1 year
0.30%
BCD expense ratio
0.26%
BCI expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCD and BCI hold 72% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

half

72% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BCD BCI
United States Treasury 5.20% 5.17%
United States Treasury 5.19% 5.07%
United States Treasury 5.18% 5.07%
United States Treasury 5.20% 5.04%
United States Treasury 4.95% 5.09%
United States Treasury 4.94% 4.99%
United States Treasury 4.93% 5.03%
United States Treasury 4.93% 4.94%
United States Treasury 4.92% 4.89%
United States Treasury 4.92% 4.80%
United States Treasury 4.68% 4.82%
United States Treasury 4.43% 5.13%
Only in BCD
United States Treasury 4.42%
Only in BCI

On the same fields

BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer abrdn abrdn
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +31.8% +40.2%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +14.6 pts +23.0 pts
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.26%
Holdings 17 16
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $445m $3.5bn

BCD and BCI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BCD in plain words

BCD tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +31.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year.

BCI in plain words

BCI tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BCD or BCI?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCD returned +31.8% and BCI +40.2%.
Which is cheaper, BCD or BCI?
BCI is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $4. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
BCD vs FTGCBCD vs HGERBCD vs DBCBCD vs PDBCBCI vs NBCMBCI vs CMDYBCI vs CMDTBCI vs PIT
BCD on its own →BCI on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
BCD and BCI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BCD and BCI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗abrdn website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BCD against BCI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bcd-vs-bci

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.