Which returned more over the last year, BCD or COMB?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCD returned +31.8% and COMB +40.1%.

Which is cheaper, BCD or COMB?

COMB is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $5. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

BCD vs COMB: how they differ

BCD and COMB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COMB returned +40.1% over the year. abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF.

COMB costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.3 points; BCD is 2.8 times larger.

	BCD	COMB
Expense ratio	0.30%	0.25%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026	$445m	$161m
Total return, 1 year	+31.8%	+40.1%
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

+31.8%

BCD total return, 1 year

+40.1%

COMB total return, 1 year

0.30%

BCD expense ratio

0.25%

COMB expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BCD and COMB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BCD COMB

Only in BCD

United States Treasury 5.20%

United States Treasury 5.19%

United States Treasury 5.18%

United States Treasury 4.95%

United States Treasury 4.94%

United States Treasury 4.93%

Only in COMB

On the same fields

BCD

abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF

COMB

GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Commodity ETF

Issuer abrdn GraniteShares

What it is Tracks an index Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +31.8% +40.1%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +14.6 pts +22.9 pts

Expense ratio 0.30% 0.25%

Holdings 17 0

Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $445m $161m

BCD and COMB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BCD in plain words

BCD tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +31.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year.

COMB in plain words

COMB is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +40.1% with distributions reinvested, against +40.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BCD or COMB?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BCD returned +31.8% and COMB +40.1%.
Which is cheaper, BCD or COMB?: COMB is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $5. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BCD vs FAAR BCD vs PIT BCD vs NBCM BCD vs CMDY COMB vs NBCM CMDY vs COMB CMDT vs COMB COMB vs PIT

BCD on its own →COMB on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BCD filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BCD prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗abrdn website ↗COMB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗COMB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗GraniteShares page for COMB ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BCD against COMB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bcd-vs-comb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.