MTUM vs TDVG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MTUM and TDVG hold 16% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned +26.9% over the year. Net assets: $19.9bn on Oct 12, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF, and $1.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF.
MTUM costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.1 points; MTUM is 15.5 times larger.
| MTUM | TDVG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 9, 2026 | $20.3bn | $1.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +26.9% | +15.8% |
| What it tracks | MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 16% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 29.8% |
| Below its high | 8.5%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and TDVG hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
16% in common
On the same fields
MTUM and TDVG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About MTUM
MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 12, 2026 it returned +26.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%. It sat 8.5% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 12, 2026.
About TDVG
TDVG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 12, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 97 positions, with the top ten at 29.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or TDVG?
- In the year to Oct 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +26.9% and TDVG +15.8%.
- Which is cheaper, MTUM or TDVG?
- MTUM is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MTUM against TDVG, data as of Oct 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-tdvg
ETFIQ. (Oct 12, 2026). MTUM against TDVG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-tdvg
[MTUM against TDVG (ETFIQ, Oct 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-tdvg)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.