OEF vs TDVG: Differences, Returns & Fees

OEF and TDVG hold 31% of their weight in the same names, and OEF returned +16.8% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $20.8bn for iShares S&P 100 ETF and $1.3bn for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF.

OEF costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.5 points; OEF is 15.9 times larger.

OEFTDVG
Expense ratio0.20%0.50%
Net assets$20.8bn$1.3bn
Total return, 1 year+16.8%+13.3%
What it tracksS&P 100No index, actively managed
Holdings in common31%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund52.6%29.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+16.8%
OEF total return, 1 year
+13.3%
TDVG total return, 1 year
0.20%
OEF expense ratio
0.50%
TDVG expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, OEF and TDVG hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

31% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding OEF TDVG
APPLE 10.00% 5.42%
MICROSOFT 7.81% 3.87%
BROADCOM INC 3.45% 3.68%
ELI LILLY 1.88% 1.86%
VISA CLASS A 1.29% 2.73%
WALMART 0.99% 1.59%
ABBVIE 0.97% 1.35%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 0.91% 1.51%
CATERPILLAR INC 0.74% 1.38%
BANK OF AMERICA 0.70% 1.91%
COCA-COLA 0.68% 1.43%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP 0.67% 1.73%
Only in OEF
AMAZON.COM INC 5.02%
ALPHABET CLASS A 4.11%
ALPHABET CLASS C 3.30%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.20%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.36%
TESLA INC 2.13%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 2.04%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.92%
Only in TDVG
J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO. 3.08%
KLA CORP 2.72%
CHUBB LTD 2.05%
ANALOG DEVICES INC 1.66%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 1.61%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 1.55%
HOWMET AEROSPACE INC 1.34%
ROSS STORES INC 1.32%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +16.8% +13.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −0.5 pts −3.9 pts
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.50%
Already in the S&P 500 99.9% 95.7%
Holdings 102 97
Net assets $20.8bn $1.3bn

OEF and TDVG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

OEF in plain words

OEF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 102 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%.

TDVG in plain words

TDVG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 97 positions, with the top ten at 29.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, OEF or TDVG?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, OEF returned +16.8% and TDVG +13.3%.
Which is cheaper, OEF or TDVG?
OEF is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do OEF and TDVG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of OEF and 96% of TDVG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, OEF against TDVG, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oef-vs-tdvg

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.