LRGC vs OEF: Differences, Returns & Fees
LRGC and OEF hold 49% of their weight in the same names, and OEF returned +16.8% over the year. Net assets: $1.4bn on Oct 8, 2026 for AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF, and $20.8bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares S&P 100 ETF.
OEF costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points; OEF is 15.2 times larger.
| LRGC | OEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.20% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $1.4bn | $20.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.4% | +16.8% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P 100 |
| Holdings in common | 49% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 45.1% | 52.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, LRGC and OEF hold 49% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
49% in common
On the same fields
LRGC and OEF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About LRGC
LRGC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 45.1%.
About OEF
OEF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 102 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, LRGC or OEF?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LRGC returned +13.4% and OEF +16.8%.
- Which is cheaper, LRGC or OEF?
- OEF is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, LRGC against OEF, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lrgc-vs-oef
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). LRGC against OEF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lrgc-vs-oef
[LRGC against OEF (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lrgc-vs-oef)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.