SPMO vs TDVG: Differences, Returns & Fees
SPMO and TDVG hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned +25.1% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $23.3bn for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF and $1.3bn for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF.
SPMO costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.8 points; SPMO is 17.8 times larger.
| SPMO | TDVG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.13% | 0.50% |
| Net assets | $23.3bn | $1.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +25.1% | +13.3% |
| What it tracks | S&P 500 Momentum Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 20% | |
| Holdings dated | Oct 10, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 50.9% | 29.8% |
| Below its high | 6.3%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SPMO and TDVG hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
20% in common
On the same fields
SPMO and TDVG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About SPMO
SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +25.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 50.9%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
About TDVG
TDVG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 97 positions, with the top ten at 29.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPMO or TDVG?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPMO returned +25.1% and TDVG +13.3%.
- Which is cheaper, SPMO or TDVG?
- SPMO is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. That is about $37 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SPMO against TDVG, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spmo-vs-tdvg
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). SPMO against TDVG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spmo-vs-tdvg
[SPMO against TDVG (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spmo-vs-tdvg)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.