JGRO vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
JGRO and MAGS hold 16% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned +12.2% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $9.8bn for JPMorgan Active Growth ETF and $5.7bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
MAGS costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.1 points; JGRO is 1.7 times larger.
| JGRO | MAGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.44% | 0.30% |
| Net assets | $9.8bn | $5.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +0.1% | +12.2% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 16% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 51.1% | 29.3% |
| Below its high | 5.6%, high on Jun 2, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 20, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JGRO and MAGS hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 20, 2026.
half
16% in common
On the same fields
JGRO and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About JGRO
JGRO is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 20, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 135 positions, with the top ten at 51.1%. It sat 5.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index.
About MAGS
MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, JGRO or MAGS?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JGRO returned +0.1% and MAGS +12.2%.
- Which is cheaper, JGRO or MAGS?
- MAGS is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, JGRO against MAGS, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jgro-vs-mags
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). JGRO against MAGS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jgro-vs-mags
[JGRO against MAGS (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jgro-vs-mags)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.