Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MAGS vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MAGS returned +5.8% to XLK's +27.1%; 10% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MAGS and XLK
Net assets: $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF, and $125.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLK costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 21.3 points; XLK is far larger, $125.0bn against $5.5bn.
| Measure | MAGS | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +5.8% | +27.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026 | 5.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Technology Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $5.5bn | $125.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 10% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 29.3% | 64.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Apr 21, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 183 weekly returnsMAGS returned more: +189.1% to +153.8%. XLK swung slightly less: 23.4% to 24.0%. XLK fell slightly less at its worst: −24.0% to −26.6%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MAGS | XLK | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +189.1% | +153.8% | MAGS | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +35.2% | +30.3% | MAGS | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +181.4% | +148.0% | MAGS | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 24.0% | 23.4% | XLK (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 14.5% | 14.9% | MAGS (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −26.6% | −24.0% | XLK (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 1.19 | 1.05 | MAGS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.97 | 1.66 | MAGS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 1.33 | 1.26 | MAGS (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 183 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and XLK hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
10% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
MAGS and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.
MAGS
MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XLK
XLK tracks an index of Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or XLK?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +5.8% and XLK +27.1%.
- Which is cheaper, MAGS or XLK?
- XLK is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MAGS against XLK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-xlk
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MAGS against XLK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-xlk
[MAGS against XLK (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-xlk)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.