Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs XLK: how they differ

ACWI and XLK hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLK returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and XLK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in XLK
NVIDIA 4.89%NVIDIA CORP 14.31%
APPLE 4.67%APPLE INC 12.98%
MICROSOFT 3.38%MICROSOFT CORP 9.90%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.38%BROADCOM INC 4.62%
ALPHABET CLASS A 1.90%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.23%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.86%MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.11%
BROADCOM INC 1.59%INTEL CORP 3.27%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.50%CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

ACWI and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
XLK
State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isMSCI ACWITechnology
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+39.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts+21.7 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%100.0%
Holdings163074

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1630 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

XLK in plain words

XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or XLK?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or XLK?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against XLK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against XLK, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-xlk Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources