JGRO vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
JGRO and ONEQ hold 48% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned +16.3% over the year. Net assets: $9.8bn on Oct 20, 2026 for JPMorgan Active Growth ETF, and $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
ONEQ costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.2 points.
| JGRO | ONEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.44% | 0.21% |
| Net assets, JGRO as of Oct 20, 2026 and ONEQ as of Sep 30, 2026 | $9.8bn | $10.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +0.1% | +16.3% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Nasdaq Composite Index |
| Holdings in common | 48% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 51.1% | 57.6% |
| Below its high | 5.6%, high on Jun 2, 2026 | 4.3%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 20, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JGRO and ONEQ hold 48% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 20, 2026.
half
48% in common
On the same fields
JGRO and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About JGRO
JGRO is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 20, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 135 positions, with the top ten at 51.1%. It sat 5.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index.
About ONEQ
ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,021 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, JGRO or ONEQ?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JGRO returned +0.1% and ONEQ +16.3%.
- Which is cheaper, JGRO or ONEQ?
- ONEQ is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, JGRO against ONEQ, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jgro-vs-oneq
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). JGRO against ONEQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jgro-vs-oneq
[JGRO against ONEQ (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jgro-vs-oneq)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.