MAGS vs SQS: Differences, Returns & Fees

MAGS and SQS hold 18% of their weight in the same names. Net assets: $5.7bn on Oct 20, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF, and $1.4bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Sapient Quality Select ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about MAGS and SQS

Answers cite the figures on this page.

MAGS costs 0.50 points a year less.

MAGS vs SQS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MAGSSQS
Expense ratio0.30%0.80%
Net assets, MAGS as of Oct 20, 2026 and SQS as of Jul 31, 2026$5.7bn$1.4bn
Total return, 1 year+12.2%not published
What it tracksNo index, actively managednot published
Holdings in common18%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.3%54.2%
Below its high4.1%, high on Aug 13, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+12.2%
MAGS total return, 1 year
+9.7%
SQS total return, since launch, Mar 16, 2026
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio
0.80%
SQS expense ratio

Get MAGS's fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and SQS hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

half

18% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding MAGS SQS
NVIDIA Corp 3.52% 9.01%
Apple Inc 3.49% 7.77%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48% 5.86%
Microsoft Corp 3.07% 3.01%
Alphabet Inc 2.45% 7.92%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04% 2.44%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Only in SQS
Eli Lilly & Co 4.86%
Broadcom Inc 4.32%
Vistra Corp 4.25%
Micron Technology Inc 3.52%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 3.39%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 3.30%
GE Vernova Inc 2.85%
Booking Holdings Inc 2.65%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
SQS
Sapient Quality Select ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Roundhill Sapient Capital
What it is Actively managed Equity fund
Total return, 1 year +12.2% +9.7% (since launch, Mar 16, 2026)
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.80%
Already in the S&P 500 22.5% 91.7%
Holdings 8 35
Net assets, MAGS as of Oct 20, 2026 and SQS as of Jul 31, 2026 $5.7bn $1.4bn

MAGS and SQS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%.

About SQS

The prospectus expense ratio is 0.80% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 35 positions, with the top ten at 54.2%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, MAGS or SQS?
MAGS is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MAGS and SQS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of MAGS and 92% of SQS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MAGS against SQS, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-sqs

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.