IVW vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
IVW and MAGS hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and IVW returned +15.7% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $77.4bn for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF and $5.7bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
IVW costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.5 points; IVW is 13.5 times larger.
| IVW | MAGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.30% |
| Net assets | $77.4bn | $5.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.7% | +12.2% |
| What it tracks | S&P 500 Growth Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 21% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 60.2% | 29.3% |
| Below its high | 4.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IVW and MAGS hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
21% in common
On the same fields
IVW and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IVW
IVW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +15.7% with distributions reinvested, against +15.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 153 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About MAGS
MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IVW or MAGS?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVW returned +15.7% and MAGS +12.2%.
- Which is cheaper, IVW or MAGS?
- IVW is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IVW against MAGS, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivw-vs-mags
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). IVW against MAGS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivw-vs-mags
[IVW against MAGS (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivw-vs-mags)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.