IVW vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees

IVW and MAGS hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and IVW returned +15.7% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $77.4bn for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF and $5.7bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about IVW and MAGS

Answers cite the figures on this page.

IVW costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.5 points; IVW is 13.5 times larger.

IVW vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
IVWMAGS
Expense ratio0.18%0.30%
Net assets$77.4bn$5.7bn
Total return, 1 year+15.7%+12.2%
What it tracksS&P 500 Growth IndexNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common21%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.2%29.3%
Below its high4.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.

+15.7%
IVW total return, 1 year
+12.2%
MAGS total return, 1 year
0.18%
IVW expense ratio
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio

Get IVW and MAGS fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IVW and MAGS hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.

half

21% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IVW MAGS
NVIDIA 14.44% 3.52%
APPLE 6.88% 3.49%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.75% 3.48%
MICROSOFT 10.89% 3.07%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 4.28% 3.04%
ALPHABET CLASS A 5.55% 2.45%
TESLA INC 1.77% 3.45%
Only in IVW
ALPHABET CLASS C 4.45%
BROADCOM INC 4.38%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.81%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.73%
ELI LILLY 2.73%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 2.41%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.66%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 1.23%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +15.7% +12.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +15.8% (SPYG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SPYG not measured
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 99.9% 22.5%
Holdings 153 8
Net assets $77.4bn $5.7bn

IVW and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IVW

IVW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +15.7% with distributions reinvested, against +15.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 153 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.

About MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IVW or MAGS?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVW returned +15.7% and MAGS +12.2%.
Which is cheaper, IVW or MAGS?
IVW is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IVW and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVW and 22% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IVW against MAGS, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivw-vs-mags

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.