Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MAGS vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MAGS returned +5.8% to QQQM's +15.2%; 22% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MAGS and QQQM

Net assets: $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF, and $110.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

At a glance
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQM costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.4 points; QQQM is far larger, $110.4bn against $5.5bn.

MAGS vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMAGSQQQM
Return
Total return, 1 year+5.8%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Oct 13, 20264.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNasdaq-100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.30%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.5bn$110.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common22%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.3%46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 21, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 183 weekly returns
MAGS QQQM
Return
Total return edge MAGS +189.1% +127.5%
Annualized edge MAGS +35.2% +26.3%
Price return edge MAGS +181.4% +122.8%
Risk
Volatility edge QQQM 24.0% 19.0%
Max drawdown edge QQQM −26.6% −21.2%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MAGS (slight) 1.19 1.08
Sortino edge MAGS 1.97 1.71
Calmar edge MAGS (slight) 1.33 1.24
Reading

MAGS returned more: +189.1% to +127.5%. QQQM swung less: 19.0% to 24.0%. QQQM fell less at its worst: −21.2% to −26.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MAGS vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMAGSQQQMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+189.1%+127.5%MAGSPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+35.2%+26.3%MAGSTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+181.4%+122.8%MAGSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility24.0%19.0%QQQMSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.5%12.1%QQQMLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−26.6%−21.2%QQQMDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe1.191.08MAGS (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.971.71MAGSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar1.331.24MAGS (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 183 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

22%

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and QQQM hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

22% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MAGS QQQM
NVIDIA Corp 3.52% 8.17%
Apple Inc 3.49% 7.88%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48% 4.25%
Tesla Inc 3.45% 3.33%
Microsoft Corp 3.07% 6.14%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04% 2.87%
Alphabet Inc 2.45% 2.93%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
Only in QQQM
Micron Technology Inc 4.50%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 2.74%
Alphabet Inc 2.72%
Broadcom Inc 2.53%
Walmart Inc 2.49%
Intel Corp 2.12%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.96%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +5.8% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +15.2% (QQQ)
Gap to its benchmark not measured 0.0 pts vs QQQ
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 22.5% 95.7%
Holdings 8 105
Net assets, MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 and QQQM as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.5bn $110.4bn

MAGS and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

MAGS and QQQM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or QQQM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +5.8% and QQQM +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or QQQM?
QQQM is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MAGS and QQQM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of MAGS and 96% of QQQM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MAGS against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-qqqm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.