MAGS vs QQEW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MAGS and QQEW hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned +12.2% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $5.7bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and $1.8bn for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF.
MAGS costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.3 points; MAGS is 3.1 times larger.
| MAGS | QQEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.55% |
| Net assets | $5.7bn | $1.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.2% | +9.9% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight Index |
| Holdings in common | 9% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 29.3% | 23.1% |
| Below its high | 5.8%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and QQEW hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
9% in common
On the same fields
MAGS and QQEW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About MAGS
MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%.
About QQEW
QQEW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +15.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 23.1%. It sat 5.8% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or QQEW?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +12.2% and QQEW +9.9%.
- Which is cheaper, MAGS or QQEW?
- MAGS is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. That is about $25 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MAGS against QQEW, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-qqew
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). MAGS against QQEW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-qqew
[MAGS against QQEW (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-qqew)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.