PABU vs QQEW: Differences, Returns & Fees
PABU and QQEW hold 24% of their weight in the same names. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $2.5bn for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF and $1.8bn for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF.
PABU costs 0.45 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; PABU is 1.3 times larger.
| PABU | QQEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.10% | 0.55% |
| Net assets | $2.5bn | $1.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.2% | +9.9% |
| What it tracks | MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index | Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight Index |
| Holdings in common | 24% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 48.9% | 23.1% |
| Below its high | 5.8%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 19, 2026.
PABU and QQEW are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. PABU follows MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index and QQEW follows Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight Index.
- Holdings in common. 24% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 19, 2026).
- Cost. PABU charges 0.10% of assets a year and QQEW 0.55%, a gap of 0.45 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PABU and QQEW hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 19, 2026.
half
24% in common
On the same fields
PABU and QQEW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About PABU
PABU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +10.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 88 positions, with the top ten at 48.9%.
About QQEW
QQEW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +15.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 23.1%. It sat 5.8% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PABU or QQEW?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PABU returned +10.2% and QQEW +9.9%.
- Which is cheaper, PABU or QQEW?
- PABU is cheaper, by 0.45 percentage points a year. That is about $45 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PABU against QQEW, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pabu-vs-qqew
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). PABU against QQEW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pabu-vs-qqew
[PABU against QQEW (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pabu-vs-qqew)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.