PABU vs QGRO: Differences, Returns & Fees
PABU and QGRO hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and PABU returned +10.2% over the year. Net assets: $2.5bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF, and $2.2bn on May 31, 2026 for American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF.
PABU costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.4 points; PABU is 1.5 times larger.
| PABU | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.10% | 0.29% |
| Net assets, as of Feb 28, 2025 | $1.9bn | $1.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.2% | +2.8% |
| What it tracks | MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index | American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 18% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 48.9% | 30.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PABU and QGRO hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
18% in common
On the same fields
PABU and QGRO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About PABU
PABU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +10.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 88 positions, with the top ten at 48.9%.
About QGRO
QGRO tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 189 positions, with the top ten at 30.9%.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PABU or QGRO?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PABU returned +10.2% and QGRO +2.8%.
- Which is cheaper, PABU or QGRO?
- PABU is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PABU against QGRO, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pabu-vs-qgro
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). PABU against QGRO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pabu-vs-qgro
[PABU against QGRO (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pabu-vs-qgro)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.