PWB vs QGRO: Differences, Returns & Fees
PWB and QGRO hold 38% of their weight in the same names, and PWB returned +20.2% over the year. Net assets: $2.6bn on Oct 20, 2026 for Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF, and $2.2bn on May 31, 2026 for American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF.
QGRO costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.4 points.
| PWB | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.55% | 0.29% |
| Net assets, PWB as of Oct 20, 2026 and QGRO as of May 31, 2026 | $2.6bn | $2.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.2% | +2.8% |
| What it tracks | Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index | American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 38% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.0% | 30.9% |
| Below its high | 8.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PWB and QGRO hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
38% in common
On the same fields
PWB and QGRO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About PWB
PWB tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
About QGRO
QGRO tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 189 positions, with the top ten at 30.9%.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PWB or QGRO?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PWB returned +20.2% and QGRO +2.8%.
- Which is cheaper, PWB or QGRO?
- QGRO is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PWB against QGRO, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwb-vs-qgro
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). PWB against QGRO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwb-vs-qgro
[PWB against QGRO (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwb-vs-qgro)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.