PWB vs QGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees
PWB and QGRW hold 48% of their weight in the same names, and PWB returned +20.2% over the year. Net assets: $2.6bn on Oct 20, 2026 for Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF, and $2.7bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund.
QGRW costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points.
| PWB | QGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.55% | 0.28% |
| Net assets, PWB as of Oct 20, 2026 and QGRW as of Jun 30, 2026 | $2.6bn | $2.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.2% | +16.8% |
| What it tracks | Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 48% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.0% | 54.1% |
| Below its high | 8.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | 4.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PWB and QGRW hold 48% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
48% in common
On the same fields
PWB and QGRW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About PWB
PWB tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
About QGRW
QGRW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +15.9% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 54.1%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PWB or QGRW?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PWB returned +20.2% and QGRW +16.8%.
- Which is cheaper, PWB or QGRW?
- QGRW is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. That is about $27 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PWB against QGRW, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwb-vs-qgrw
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). PWB against QGRW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwb-vs-qgrw
[PWB against QGRW (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwb-vs-qgrw)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.