QGRO vs QGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees
QGRO and QGRW hold 31% of their weight in the same names, and QGRW returned +16.8% over the year. Net assets: $2.2bn on May 31, 2026 for American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF, and $2.7bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund.
QGRW costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.0 points.
| QGRO | QGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.28% |
| Net assets, QGRO as of May 31, 2026 and QGRW as of Jun 30, 2026 | $2.2bn | $2.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.8% | +16.8% |
| What it tracks | American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 31% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 30.9% | 54.1% |
| Below its high | 4.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
QGRO and QGRW are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. QGRO follows American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index and QGRW follows WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 31% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 QGRO returned +2.8% and QGRW +16.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 14.0 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QGRO and QGRW hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
31% in common
On the same fields
QGRO and QGRW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About QGRO
QGRO tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 189 positions, with the top ten at 30.9%.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth.
About QGRW
QGRW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +15.9% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 54.1%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, QGRO or QGRW?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QGRO returned +2.8% and QGRW +16.8%.
- Which is cheaper, QGRO or QGRW?
- QGRW is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, QGRO against QGRW, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qgro-vs-qgrw
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). QGRO against QGRW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qgro-vs-qgrw
[QGRO against QGRW (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qgro-vs-qgrw)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.