Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

QGRO vs TCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QGRO returned +1.8% to TCHP's −2.0%; 24% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QGRO and TCHP

Net assets: $2.2bn on May 31, 2026 for American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF, and $2.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF.

At a glance
+1.8%
QGRO total return, 1 year
−2.0%
TCHP total return, 1 year
0.29%
QGRO expense ratio
0.57%
TCHP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QGRO costs 0.28 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.8 points.

QGRO vs TCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQGROTCHP
Return
Total return, 1 year+1.8%−2.0%
Drawdown
Below its high5.4%, high on Jun 1, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksAmerican Century U.S. Quality Growth IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.29%0.57%
Net assets, QGRO as of May 31, 2026 and TCHP as of Oct 27, 2026$2.2bn$2.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common24%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund30.9%56.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 14, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 323 weekly returns · each against IWF
QGRO TCHP
Return
Total return edge QGRO +120.7% +94.7%
Annualized edge QGRO +13.6% +11.3%
Price return edge QGRO +116.3% +94.6%
Risk
Volatility edge QGRO (slight) 20.1% 21.8%
Max drawdown edge QGRO −31.5% −41.8%
Downside capture 95.5% 104.5%
Beta 0.92 1.06
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QGRO 0.58 0.46
Sortino edge QGRO 0.87 0.69
Treynor 0.126 0.093
Calmar edge QGRO 0.43 0.27
Against the benchmark
Alpha 0.0% a year −3.4% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.01 −2.16
Information ratio −0.13 −0.65
Tracking error 7.7% 4.1%
Reading

QGRO returned more: +120.7% to +94.7%. QGRO swung slightly less: 20.1% to 21.8%. QGRO fell less at its worst: −31.5% to −41.8%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: QGRO vs TCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQGROTCHPIWFEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+120.7%+94.7%QGROPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.6%+11.3%QGROTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+116.3%+94.6%QGROPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.1%21.8%QGRO (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.3%14.4%QGRO (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.5%−41.8%QGRODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture87.6%104.0%100.0%TCHPShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture95.5%104.5%100.0%QGRO (slight)Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.921.061.00QGRO lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.860.971.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.46QGROReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.870.69QGROReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1260.0930.126QGROReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.430.27QGROAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWFIWFIWFThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha0.0% a year−3.4% a year0.0%TCHP significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.01−2.16Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−6.0% to +6.0%−6.5% to −0.3%QGRO's includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.13−0.65QGROReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.7%4.1%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 323 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

24%

By the books each fund has filed, QGRO and TCHP hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

24% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QGRO TCHP
Apple Inc 3.90% 4.54%
NVIDIA Corp 3.15% 15.95%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.58% 3.20%
Lam Research Corp 3.07% 2.51%
Mastercard Inc 3.10% 1.75%
Applied Materials Inc 1.50% 2.50%
Netflix Inc 3.10% 1.46%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.12% 3.51%
Booking Holdings Inc 1.19% 0.92%
Intuitive Surgical Inc 1.54% 0.91%
Monolithic Power Systems Inc 1.69% 0.72%
Micron Technology Inc 0.57% 2.62%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in QGRO
TJX Cos Inc 3.23%
KLA Corp 3.03%
Arista Networks Inc 2.83%
AppLovin Corp 2.77%
Amphenol Corp 2.33%
Ralph Lauren Corp 2.23%
McKesson Corp 2.22%
Costco Wholesale Corp 2.07%
Only in TCHP
BROADCOM INC 5.96%
ALPHABET INC CL A 5.85%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.64%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.32%
CARVANA CO 3.24%
GE Aerospace 1.97%
ASML HOLDING NV NY 1.61%
GE VERNOVA LLC 1.11%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

QGRO American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +1.8% −2.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +0.9% (IWF) +0.9% (IWF)
Gap to its benchmark +0.9 pts vs IWF −2.9 pts vs IWF
Expense ratio 0.29% 0.57%
Already in the S&P 500 79.9% 95.2%
Holdings 189 66
Net assets, QGRO as of May 31, 2026 and TCHP as of Oct 27, 2026 $2.2bn $2.1bn

QGRO and TCHP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-5ABA6E203A

QGRO and TCHP are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. QGRO follows American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index and TCHP follows No index, actively managed.
  2. Holdings in common. 24% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 QGRO returned +1.8% and TCHP −2.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

TCHP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QGRO

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.8% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth.

QGRO tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 189 positions, with the top ten at 30.9%.

TCHP

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index.

TCHP is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 56.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QGRO or TCHP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QGRO returned +1.8% and TCHP −2.0%.
Which is cheaper, QGRO or TCHP?
QGRO is cheaper, by 0.28 percentage points a year. That is about $28 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QGRO and TCHP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 80% of QGRO and 95% of TCHP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QGRO against TCHP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qgro-vs-tchp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.