PWB vs TCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
PWB and TCHP hold 43% of their weight in the same names, and PWB returned +20.2% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $2.6bn for Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF and $2.2bn for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF.
PWB costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.8 points; PWB is 1.2 times larger.
| PWB | TCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.55% | 0.57% |
| Net assets | $2.6bn | $2.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.2% | +2.4% |
| What it tracks | Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 43% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.0% | 56.7% |
| Below its high | 8.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | 5.1%, high on Jun 1, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PWB and TCHP hold 43% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
43% in common
On the same fields
PWB and TCHP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About PWB
PWB tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
About TCHP
TCHP is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 56.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.4% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PWB or TCHP?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PWB returned +20.2% and TCHP +2.4%.
- Which is cheaper, PWB or TCHP?
- PWB is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PWB against TCHP, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwb-vs-tchp
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). PWB against TCHP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwb-vs-tchp
[PWB against TCHP (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pwb-vs-tchp)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.