MAGS vs QGRO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MAGS and QGRO hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned +12.2% over the year. Net assets: $5.7bn on Oct 20, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF, and $2.2bn on May 31, 2026 for American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF.
QGRO costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.4 points.
| MAGS | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.29% |
| Net assets, MAGS as of Oct 20, 2026 and QGRO as of May 31, 2026 | $5.7bn | $2.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.2% | +2.8% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 9% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 29.3% | 30.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
MAGS and QGRO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. MAGS follows No index, actively managed and QGRO follows American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 9% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 MAGS returned +12.2% and QGRO +2.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.4 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and QGRO hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
9% in common
On the same fields
MAGS and QGRO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About MAGS
MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%.
About QGRO
QGRO tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 189 positions, with the top ten at 30.9%.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or QGRO?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +12.2% and QGRO +2.8%.
- Which is cheaper, MAGS or QGRO?
- QGRO is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MAGS against QGRO, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-qgro
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). MAGS against QGRO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-qgro
[MAGS against QGRO (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-qgro)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.