MAGS vs RPG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MAGS and RPG hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and RPG returned +15.5% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $5.7bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and $1.8bn for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF.
MAGS costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.3 points; MAGS is 3.2 times larger.
| MAGS | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.35% |
| Net assets | $5.7bn | $1.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.2% | +15.5% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P 500 Pure Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 5% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 29.3% | 29.3% |
| Below its high | 13.9%, high on Jun 30, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and RPG hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
5% in common
On the same fields
MAGS and RPG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About MAGS
MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%.
About RPG
RPG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested, against +15.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 70 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 13.9% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or RPG?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +12.2% and RPG +15.5%.
- Which is cheaper, MAGS or RPG?
- MAGS is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MAGS against RPG, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-rpg
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). MAGS against RPG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-rpg
[MAGS against RPG (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-rpg)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.